conditions imposed by the sentencing judge permit the use of
devices capable of accessing the Internet or e-mail not only at
the appellant’s place of employment, but also “as required for
employment related purposes”.
 Finally, one must recall that the dispute at trial regarding
an order under s. 161(1)(d) concerned the need for such an order,
not the scope of the order in the event one was made. The Crown
sought a ten-year order containing terms set out in s. 161(1)(a)-(d).
The Crown submitted the conditions to be attached to a s. 161(1)(d)
order should mirror those in the probation order. Defence counsel opposed the imposition of any s. 161(1) order. In the alternative, he took the position that the only s. 161(1) condition that
might be appropriate was s. 161(1)(d), with conditions that mirrored those of the probation order. In the result, the sentencing
judge granted only an order under s. 161(1)(d), which limited
the appellant’s access to the Internet on the terms worked out
 In those circumstances, I would not interfere with the sentencing judge’s s. 161(1)(d) order. The sentencing judge considered the relevant factors and crafted an order that reasonably
attempted to minimize the risk the appellant poses to children
and responded to his specific circumstances.
 Although I would grant the appellant leave to appeal from
the Internet limiting terms, I would dismiss his appeal.
 For the reasons set out above, I would dismiss the appellant’s appeal from conviction. I would grant him leave to appeal
from the Internet limiting terms, but I would dismiss his appeal.
Sa Majesté la Reine c. Schulz
[Répertorié : R. c. Schulz]
Cour d’appel de l’Ontario, les juges Watt, D.M. Brown et Huscroft
29 juin 2018
Charte des droits et libertés — Fouilles, perquisitions et saisies —
Exclusion d’éléments de preuve — La police a obtenu un mandat
l’autorisant à perquisitionner la résidence de l’accusé, qui est avocat,
afin d’y trouver des documents et des appareils électroniques susceptibles de contenir des éléments de preuve relatifs à une infraction de